<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UglyBlog &#187; FITCH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designugly.com/blog/tag/fitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designugly.com/blog</link>
	<description>A casual design blog for DesignUgly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation: Black or White?</title>
		<link>http://designugly.com/blog/2008/09/innovation-black-or-white/</link>
		<comments>http://designugly.com/blog/2008/09/innovation-black-or-white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Faraz Shah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IDSA 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FITCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designugly.com/blog/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fitch gave an excellent presentation further defining the always vague concept of innovation.  The presentation broke the concept into two sections: being innovative and actual innovation.  The presenter from Fitch defined being innovative as a re-establishment of an existing product or solution.  Something that is not totally unique, but a new realization. An example that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitch gave an excellent presentation further defining the always vague concept of innovation.  The presentation broke the concept into two sections: being innovative and actual innovation.  The presenter from Fitch defined being innovative as a re-establishment of an existing product or solution.  Something that is not totally unique, but a new realization.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_66" class="wp-caption  alignleft" style="width: 410px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://designugly.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/innovation2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-66" title="Innovation vs. Innovative" src="http://designugly.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/innovation2.jpg" alt="Innovation vs. Innovative" width="400" height="300" /></a></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>An example that he gave was that of a CD player.  When the product first came to market, it was a true innovation.  There was not a product like it, and it was an improvement on the audio experience above and beyond its predecessors.  On the other hand, a product like the Bang &amp; Olufson CD player was innovative in its approach to aesthetics and interaction, but was not a true innovation.  This differentiation is something that could be utilzed in a product development plan.  By categorizing product initiatives as something that is innovative or an innovation will help to determine the scale of resources as well as a time line for completion.  An innovative product can be put in the pipeline for short or near term realizations, while an innovation might be a long term (or open ended) time line.  Fitch&#8217;s approach is to utilze this differentiation throughout it&#8217;s business practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://designugly.com/blog/2008/09/innovation-black-or-white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

